In the world of Commander, it's a common debate among players: should we allow multiple commanders in a single deck? The answer to this question has been a topic of discussion for some time now. While it may seem like a simple issue, there are many complexities involved.

One of the main concerns is that having multiple commanders could lead to an imbalance in gameplay. For example, if one commander has a powerful ability and another has a weaker ability, it could give the player an unfair advantage. This is particularly true when playing against opponents with smaller mana bases or those who are on a budget.

Another concern is that allowing multiple commanders could make the game more complicated and less accessible to new players. The rules of Commander are already complex, and adding more variables to the mix could make it difficult for newer players to understand what's going on.

Despite these concerns, there are also some arguments in favor of allowing multiple commanders. For example, it could allow for more creative deck-building and give players more options when constructing their decks. It could also lead to more interesting gameplay interactions and strategies.

Ultimately, the decision to allow multiple commanders will depend on a variety of factors, including the type of cards that are available and the preferences of the player base. While there are some valid concerns about allowing multiple commanders, there are also some potential benefits. In the end, it will be up to Wizards of the Coast, the creators of Magic: The Gathering, to decide whether or not to allow this in future sets.

In conclusion, having one commander is a rule that has been in place for a long time, and while there are valid concerns about allowing multiple commanders, there are also potential benefits. It will be interesting to see what the future holds for Commander and whether we will ever see multiple commanders allowed in the game.

Why have one commander